.jpeg)
In a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over the controversial tinted glass permit, the Federal High Court in Warri, Delta State, has issued an interim order directing the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) and the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to maintain the status quo pending further judicial proceedings. The ruling, delivered on Friday, October 3, 2025, underscores the court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that judicial processes are respected while the substantive issues in the case are resolved.
The case, identified as Suit No. FHC/WR/CS/103/2025, pits John Aikpokpo-Martins, the plaintiff, against the Inspector General of Police and the Nigeria Police Force. It centers on the contentious issue of tinted glass permits, which has sparked widespread debate across Nigeria due to its implications for privacy, security, and law enforcement practices. The use of tinted glass in vehicles has long been a subject of contention, with the Nigeria Police Force maintaining that it poses security risks, as it can conceal the identities of vehicle occupants and potentially facilitate criminal activities. On the other hand, citizens argue that tinted glass is a legitimate feature for privacy, sun protection, and aesthetic purposes, and that blanket restrictions infringe on personal rights.
The court’s interim order comes as a response to concerns raised in the lawsuit regarding the enforcement of tinted glass regulations by the police. While the specifics of the plaintiff’s claims were not detailed in the court’s public statement, the directive to maintain the status quo suggests that the court seeks to prevent any unilateral actions by the police—such as aggressive enforcement, seizures, or penalties related to tinted glass—until the legal questions surrounding the permit are fully adjudicated. This order effectively pauses any changes to the existing framework governing tinted glass permits, ensuring that neither the police nor the plaintiff can alter the current situation until the court provides further clarity.
Kunle Edun, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), who led the legal team representing the plaintiff, hailed the court’s decision as a critical step toward safeguarding the rule of law. Speaking to journalists after the hearing, Edun emphasized that the interim order reinforces the judiciary’s role as a check on executive actions and ensures that due process is followed. “This directive is a major step in ensuring that the rule of law is upheld while the substantive issues in the case are being determined,” Edun stated. He further noted that the order protects citizens from arbitrary enforcement actions and preserves the integrity of the judicial process.
The tinted glass permit controversy has been a recurring issue in Nigeria, with the Nigeria Police Force periodically cracking down on vehicles with tinted windows, citing security concerns. The police argue that tinted glass makes it difficult for law enforcement officers to identify occupants of vehicles, particularly in cases involving suspected criminal activity. In recent years, there have been reports of motorists being fined, harassed, or having their vehicles impounded for using tinted glass without a permit. However, obtaining such permits has often been described as a cumbersome and opaque process, leading to accusations of selective enforcement and abuse of power.
On the other side of the debate, many Nigerians view the restrictions on tinted glass as an overreach by the police, arguing that tinted windows are a standard feature in many modern vehicles and serve practical purposes such as reducing glare and protecting against ultraviolet rays. Critics also point out that the lack of clear, consistent guidelines for obtaining permits creates confusion and opens the door to extortion by law enforcement officers. The issue has sparked public outcry, with some citizens taking to social media platforms like X to express their frustration over what they perceive as heavy-handed tactics by the police.
The Warri Federal High Court’s decision to issue an interim order reflects the judiciary’s recognition of the broader implications of the case. By directing the police to maintain the status quo, the court is signaling its intent to thoroughly examine the legal and constitutional questions surrounding the tinted glass permit regime. This includes whether the police’s actions align with the principles of fairness, transparency, and respect for individual rights, as well as whether the regulations themselves are consistent with Nigerian law.
The case is expected to draw significant attention in the coming weeks, as it touches on issues of personal freedom, law enforcement authority, and the balance between security and individual rights. Legal analysts suggest that the outcome of the case could set a precedent for how similar regulatory disputes are handled in the future, potentially influencing policies on vehicle modifications and other areas where law enforcement intersects with personal liberties.
For now, the court’s interim order provides a temporary reprieve for motorists who have faced challenges due to the tinted glass restrictions. It also places pressure on the Nigeria Police Force to ensure that its actions comply with judicial oversight and respect the rights of citizens. As the case progresses, both sides will likely present detailed arguments to support their positions, with the plaintiff seeking to challenge the legality or implementation of the tinted glass permit system, and the police defending their authority to regulate vehicle features in the interest of public safety.
The next hearing in the case is expected to shed more light on the substantive issues at stake, including the legal basis for the tinted glass permit requirement and the extent of the police’s powers in enforcing it. Until then, the court’s directive to maintain the status quo serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s critical role in mediating disputes between citizens and state institutions. It also underscores the importance of due process in addressing contentious issues that affect the daily lives of Nigerians.
As the legal proceedings continue, stakeholders, including motorists, legal experts, and civil society organizations, will be closely monitoring developments in the case. The outcome could have far-reaching implications not only for the tinted glass permit issue but also for broader questions about the balance of power between the state and its citizens. For now, the Federal High Court’s interim order stands as a testament to the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring that justice is served in a fair and transparent manner.
