The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), a separatist movement led by detained activist Nnamdi Kanu, has strongly rejected a recent report attributed to the Nigerian government describing individuals and groups allegedly linked to terrorism financing. The group dismissed the document as what it called a “theatre of absurdity,” insisting it is politically motivated and aimed at discrediting its movement.
In a press statement issued on April 13, 2026, and signed by its spokesperson, Emma Powerful, IPOB described the publication as “a disgraceful farce” and “a desperate attempt at state-sponsored deception.” The statement was circulated to supporters and international observers, where the group reiterated its long-standing position that it is a peaceful movement advocating self-determination for the Igbo people.
The group said the alleged terrorism sponsorship list is not a legitimate security document but rather a political instrument designed to mislead both domestic and international audiences. IPOB accused Nigerian authorities of attempting to shift attention away from what it described as historical and ongoing state violence against civilians in the country’s south-east region.
“The list is a laughable and intellectually bankrupt exercise meant to mask the truth,” the statement read. The organization argued that successive Nigerian governments have consistently used security labels to silence dissent and criminalize political expression, particularly in relation to the agitation for the restoration of Biafra.
It further alleged that the Nigerian state has a history of excessive force against unarmed civilians, referencing past military operations in the south-east. IPOB claimed that peaceful protests, religious gatherings, and community assemblies have at times been met with violent crackdowns, allegations that have been repeatedly denied or contested by Nigerian authorities.
The group also referenced the Nigerian Civil War (1967–1970), stating that the suffering experienced during that period remains a key historical grievance for the Igbo population. It alleged that millions of civilians were affected during the conflict and argued that the legacy of the war continues to shape relations between the Nigerian state and pro-Biafra groups.
IPOB further criticized the continued detention of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu, who remains in custody facing charges including treasonable felony and terrorism-related allegations, according to Nigerian prosecutors. The group maintained that his arrest and prosecution are politically motivated and part of a broader effort to suppress the Biafran self-determination movement.
The organization categorically denied any involvement in terrorism or violent activity, insisting that it remains committed to peaceful advocacy. It stated that it operates within international principles of self-determination and human rights and claimed recognition in some jurisdictions outside Nigeria where its activities are not restricted.
“No Igbo son or daughter is a sponsor of terrorism,” the statement declared. “IPOB is not a terrorist organization. IPOB is a people-driven movement anchored on the inalienable right to self-determination.”
The group accused the Nigerian government of attempting to criminalize an entire ethnic identity through association and guilt by labeling, warning that such actions could deepen national divisions and further destabilize the region.
IPOB also alleged that the publication of the list forms part of a broader international propaganda effort aimed at influencing foreign governments and institutions. It argued that while it is portrayed negatively within Nigeria, it continues to operate as a lawful advocacy group in several countries abroad, and said this contradiction exposes what it called “crude misinformation.”
The statement urged supporters worldwide not to be discouraged by repeated attempts at intimidation and political labeling, insisting that such measures have historically failed to weaken its resolve.
“Demonization will not stop the agitation. Propaganda will not erase reality. Falsehood will not defeat truth,” it said.
The group maintained that the struggle for Biafran self-determination is rooted in justice, dignity, and historical grievances, and therefore cannot be extinguished through legal designations or security classifications. It added that labeling individuals or groups as terrorists without due process undermines both national cohesion and international credibility.
While the Nigerian government has not formally responded to IPOB’s latest statement at the time of this report, issues surrounding separatist movements in the south-east remain a sensitive topic in national security discussions. Authorities have previously maintained that certain armed groups operating in the region are responsible for attacks on security personnel and infrastructure, a position IPOB consistently denies.
Security analysts note that disputes over designation, labeling, and interpretation of separatist activities continue to shape the broader political and security environment in the region.
IPOB’s latest rejection of the alleged terrorism sponsorship list reflects ongoing tensions between the Nigerian state and separatist movements seeking self-determination. The group insists that it remains a peaceful organization unjustly targeted by state authorities, while reiterating its demand for political recognition and the release of its detained leader.
As debates over security, governance, and national unity continue, the controversy surrounding such lists and their implications is expected to remain a significant point of contention in Nigeria’s political landscape.
