.jpg)
In a significant escalation of regional tensions, the Yemeni Armed Forces, under the control of the Houthi movement, have announced a series of coordinated military operations targeting Israeli military and civilian infrastructure. These actions, described as retaliatory measures, aim to pressure Israel to halt what the Yemeni forces characterize as a "genocide" in the Gaza Strip while also responding to recent Israeli airstrikes on Yemeni territory. The operations, which involved the use of advanced weaponry, including a hypersonic ballistic missile and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), mark a bold assertion of Yemen’s military capabilities and its willingness to engage directly in the broader Israel-Palestine conflict.
Details of the Military Operations
According to an official statement released on September 16, 2025, from Sana’a, the capital of Houthi-controlled Yemen, the Yemeni Armed Forces executed two major operations targeting Israeli sites. The first operation saw the deployment of a Palestine-2 hypersonic ballistic missile by Yemen’s missile unit. The target was described as a “sensitive Israeli target” located in Yaffa, a city in the occupied territories more commonly known as Jaffa, adjacent to Tel Aviv. The choice of a hypersonic missile, capable of traveling at speeds exceeding five times the speed of sound and following unpredictable trajectories, underscores Yemen’s growing technological sophistication in its missile arsenal. The statement claimed that the strike achieved its objectives, forcing large numbers of Israeli settlers to seek safety in bomb shelters. This disruption was intended to send a clear message to Israel about the reach and precision of Yemen’s military capabilities.
In a parallel operation, Yemen’s UAV force conducted a strike on Ramon Airport, located in the southern city of Umm al-Rashrash, known internationally as Eilat. The use of drones in this attack highlights the multifaceted nature of Yemen’s military strategy, combining long-range missile technology with more agile and cost-effective UAVs. The targeting of Ramon Airport, a key transportation hub in Israel’s southern region, suggests an intent to disrupt both civilian and military operations in the area. While specific details about the damage caused by the drone strike were not provided in the Yemeni statement, the choice of target indicates a strategic effort to undermine Israel’s sense of security and economic stability.
Israeli authorities responded to the attacks, claiming that their air defense systems intercepted at least one missile. They also reported drone activity near the Egyptian border, though it remains unclear whether these drones were part of the Yemeni operation or unrelated incidents. The Israeli response was characteristically measured, with officials emphasizing the effectiveness of their defense systems while downplaying the impact of the attacks. However, the fact that settlers were forced into shelters suggests that the Yemeni strikes achieved at least a psychological impact, if not significant material damage.
Context of the Strikes: Gaza and Israeli Airstrikes on Yemen
The Yemeni operations come in the wake of a series of Israeli airstrikes on Yemen, which have caused significant loss of life and heightened tensions in the region. According to reports, these airstrikes targeted Houthi-controlled areas and resulted in the deaths of dozens of civilians, as well as senior Yemeni officials, including Prime Minister Ahmed al-Rahawi. The loss of such a high-ranking figure has intensified Yemen’s resolve to retaliate, framing the strikes as a direct response to Israeli aggression. The Yemeni Armed Forces’ statement explicitly linked their actions to both the ongoing conflict in Gaza and the attacks on their own territory, presenting their operations as a form of self-defense and solidarity with the Palestinian cause.
The Gaza conflict, which has been a focal point of regional and international attention since its escalation in October 2023, has seen widespread destruction and loss of life. The Yemeni Armed Forces, aligned with the Houthi movement, have consistently expressed support for the Palestinian people, viewing their struggle as part of a broader fight against perceived imperialism and oppression in the Middle East. The term “genocide” used in the Yemeni statement reflects the Houthi narrative, which accuses Israel of committing systematic atrocities against Palestinians in Gaza. While this terminology is highly contentious and disputed by Israel and its allies, it underscores the ideological motivations behind Yemen’s military actions.
The Israeli airstrikes on Yemen, meanwhile, are part of a broader pattern of Israel targeting groups and states it perceives as threats to its security. The Houthis, who have controlled much of northern Yemen since 2014, have increasingly positioned themselves as key players in the so-called “Axis of Resistance,” a loose coalition of Iran-aligned groups that includes Hezbollah in Lebanon and various militias in Iraq and Syria. Israel’s strikes on Yemen are likely intended to deter Houthi attacks and disrupt their supply lines, which are believed to be supported by Iran. However, these actions have had the opposite effect, galvanizing the Houthis to escalate their operations and assert their relevance on the regional stage.
Statements from Yemeni Leadership
Brigadier General Yahya Saree, the official spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces, provided a detailed explanation of the rationale behind the strikes during a televised address from Sana’a. Saree described the operations as part of Yemen’s “moral and religious duty” to support the Palestinian people, who have been under siege in Gaza for nearly two years. He emphasized that the strikes were not isolated acts but part of a sustained campaign to pressure Israel into lifting the blockade on Gaza and ceasing its military operations in the Palestinian territories. Saree’s rhetoric was steeped in religious and moral undertones, reflecting the Houthi movement’s ideological framework, which blends Shia Islam with anti-imperialist sentiment.
Saree also issued a stern warning to other Arab and Islamic nations, accusing them of complicity through their silence in the face of Israeli aggression. He argued that the lack of unified action from the broader Muslim world has emboldened Israel to expand its military operations beyond Palestine to other countries, including Yemen. This critique is part of a broader Houthi narrative that seeks to position the movement as a defender of Islamic and Arab honor, in contrast to what they perceive as the passivity of other regional powers, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
The Yemeni statement concluded with a reaffirmation of the country’s commitment to continued military action until the Gaza blockade is lifted and Israeli attacks cease. This pledge suggests that the Houthis are prepared for a prolonged confrontation, potentially escalating the conflict further and drawing in other regional actors. The use of advanced weaponry, such as the Palestine-2 hypersonic missile, also signals Yemen’s intent to project power far beyond its borders, challenging the traditional dominance of more established military powers in the region.
Regional and International Implications
The Yemeni strikes on Israel represent a significant escalation in an already volatile region. The involvement of a non-state actor like the Houthis in direct military operations against Israel complicates the geopolitical landscape, raising questions about the potential for further escalation and the involvement of other parties. The Houthis’ alignment with Iran, which is believed to provide them with financial, military, and logistical support, adds another layer of complexity to the situation. Israel has long accused Iran of orchestrating attacks through its proxies, and the Yemeni strikes may be seen as evidence of Tehran’s growing influence in the region.
For Iran, the Houthi attacks serve a dual purpose: they demonstrate the reach of its regional network while also diverting attention from its own domestic challenges. By supporting groups like the Houthis, Iran can project power indirectly, avoiding direct confrontation with Israel or its allies, such as the United States. However, this strategy carries risks, as it could provoke a stronger Israeli response or lead to increased international pressure on Iran to curb its support for militant groups.
The response from other Arab and Islamic nations will be critical in shaping the trajectory of the conflict. Many of these countries, particularly those in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), have complex relationships with both Israel and the Houthis. Saudi Arabia, for instance, has been engaged in a decade-long war against the Houthis in Yemen, while also pursuing normalization talks with Israel in recent years. The Yemeni strikes could strain these delicate diplomatic efforts, forcing regional powers to take sides in a conflict they have sought to avoid.
The international community, including the United Nations and major powers like the United States and European Union, has so far struggled to address the root causes of the Gaza conflict and the broader regional tensions. The Yemeni strikes may prompt renewed calls for diplomatic intervention, but the entrenched positions of the parties involved make a resolution unlikely in the near term. The United States, as Israel’s primary ally, is likely to condemn the Yemeni attacks and reaffirm its support for Israel’s right to self-defense. However, Washington’s ability to influence the situation is limited, given its own domestic political challenges and the complexity of the regional dynamics.
Historical Context: Yemen’s Role in the Israel-Palestine Conflict
Yemen’s involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict may seem surprising to some, given the geographical distance between the two regions. However, the Houthi movement has long framed its struggle as part of a broader fight against oppression and imperialism, drawing parallels between their own experiences in Yemen and the Palestinian struggle. The Houthis rose to prominence in the early 2000s, initially as a Zaydi Shia revivalist movement in northern Yemen. Over time, they evolved into a powerful military and political force, seizing control of Sana’a in 2014 and establishing themselves as the de facto government in much of the country.
The Houthis’ alignment with the Palestinian cause is rooted in both ideological and strategic considerations. Ideologically, they view Israel as a colonial power oppressing an indigenous population, a narrative that resonates with their own experiences of marginalization and conflict with external powers, particularly Saudi Arabia. Strategically, aligning with Palestine allows the Houthis to gain legitimacy among other anti-Israel groups in the region, strengthening their position within the Axis of Resistance.
Yemen’s military capabilities have also evolved significantly in recent years, largely due to support from Iran. The development of hypersonic missiles and advanced drones has given the Houthis the ability to strike targets far beyond their borders, as demonstrated by previous attacks on Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The use of such weaponry against Israel marks a new phase in Yemen’s military strategy, signaling its ambition to play a more prominent role in regional conflicts.
Challenges and Risks for Yemen
While the Yemeni strikes may bolster the Houthis’ reputation among their supporters, they also carry significant risks. Israel’s military superiority and advanced defense systems, such as the Iron Dome and David’s Sling, make it unlikely that Yemen’s attacks will cause substantial material damage. However, the psychological and political impact of the strikes cannot be underestimated, as they challenge Israel’s sense of invulnerability and expose vulnerabilities in its defense infrastructure.
The Houthis also face domestic challenges that could limit their ability to sustain a prolonged campaign against Israel. Yemen remains one of the world’s poorest countries, with widespread poverty, food insecurity, and a humanitarian crisis exacerbated by years of war. The Houthi leadership must balance its external ambitions with the need to maintain control and provide for the population in the areas it governs. Continued Israeli airstrikes on Yemen could further strain these resources, potentially weakening the Houthis’ grip on power.
Moreover, the Houthis’ reliance on Iranian support makes them vulnerable to shifts in Tehran’s priorities. If Iran faces increased pressure from the international community or decides to scale back its regional activities, the Houthis could find themselves isolated. Similarly, any escalation in the conflict could draw in other regional powers, such as Saudi Arabia, which has its own reasons to oppose the Houthis and may see an opportunity to weaken them further.
Conclusion
The Yemeni Armed Forces’ strikes on Israeli targets represent a bold and risky move in an already volatile region. By targeting key sites in Yaffa and Eilat, the Houthis have demonstrated their willingness to escalate their involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict, while also responding to Israeli attacks on their own territory. The use of advanced weaponry, such as the Palestine-2 hypersonic missile and drones, underscores Yemen’s growing military capabilities and its ambition to assert itself as a regional player.
The operations have broader implications for the Middle East, potentially straining diplomatic efforts, escalating tensions between Israel and Iran-aligned groups, and complicating the search for a resolution to the Gaza conflict. As the Yemeni Armed Forces pledge to continue their campaign until the Gaza blockade is lifted, the region braces for further instability, with the potential for a wider conflict looming on the horizon.
The international community faces a daunting challenge in addressing the root causes of these interconnected conflicts. For now, the Yemeni strikes serve as a stark reminder of the enduring complexities of the Middle East, where local grievances, ideological struggles, and geopolitical rivalries continue to fuel violence and unrest.
