In a significant overhaul of Ukraine's top leadership amid ongoing war and diplomatic pressures, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has appointed Kyrylo Budanov, the 39-year-old head of the Main Directorate of Intelligence (GUR), as the new chief of the Office of the President. The move, announced on January 2, 2026, places a prominent military figure at the center of political and strategic decision-making, marking a departure from the traditionally civilian nature of the role.
Zelenskyy stated that Ukraine requires greater emphasis on security, defense development, and diplomacy at this critical juncture. "Kyrylo has specialized experience in these areas and sufficient strength to deliver results," the president noted, highlighting the need to prioritize these domains through the presidential office. Budanov, a decorated lieutenant general and veteran of special operations, accepted the nomination, describing it as "an honour and a responsibility" to address strategic security issues during this historic period for Ukraine.
Budanov replaces Andriy Yermak, Zelenskyy's longtime confidant and influential chief of staff, who resigned in November 2025 following a corruption scandal involving raids on properties linked to him as part of a broader anti-graft investigation in the energy sector. Yermak, a divisive figure accused by critics of accumulating excessive power and sidelining dissent, had been a key negotiator in international talks. His departure left the position vacant for over a month, fueling speculation about internal tensions.
The appointment of Budanov, widely regarded as a national hero for orchestrating high-profile operations against Russian targets—including strikes deep inside Russia—signals a "war footing" shift for the presidential office. Previously focused on domestic politics and administration, the role will now emphasize military strategy, intelligence coordination, and diplomatic efforts amid U.S.-led initiatives to negotiate an end to Russia's nearly four-year invasion. Analysts view this as an effort to bolster public trust in Zelenskyy's leadership at a challenging time, with Russian forces advancing in eastern Ukraine and mounting international pressure for peace talks.
In a related succession move, Zelenskyy appointed Oleh Ivashchenko, previously head of Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence Service (SZR), as the new chief of the GUR. Ivashchenko, a career intelligence officer appointed to the SZR in March 2024, will focus on limiting Russia's military potential through international disruptions and sanctions enforcement. Presidential decrees formalizing both appointments—dismissing Budanov from GUR and Ivashchenko from SZR—were published on the official presidential website on January 2.
The reshuffle extends beyond the presidential office. Zelenskyy proposed Mykhailo Fedorov, the innovative Minister of Digital Transformation known for advancing Ukraine's drone programs and digital services, as the new Defense Minister. Fedorov would replace the current minister, with parliamentary approval required. Additionally, changes to the leadership of the State Border Guard Service were announced, though details remain pending. These moves underscore a broader "substantial overhaul" aimed at enhancing resilience in defense technology and security apparatus.
Budanov, born in 1986, rose to prominence after his 2020 appointment as GUR chief at age 34, making him one of Ukraine's youngest top intelligence leaders. A former special forces operative wounded multiple times in combat, including during the 2014 Donbas conflict, he has survived several Russian assassination attempts. Credited with bold operations—such as incursions into Russian territory and strikes on Black Sea Fleet assets—Budanov has cultivated a legendary status, often polling higher in public trust than Zelenskyy himself. Some observers speculate the move neutralizes him as a potential political rival ahead of possible future elections, while others see it as grooming a successor or leveraging his credibility for negotiations.
The timing coincides with heightened diplomatic activity. Zelenskyy recently described a U.S.-brokered peace framework as "90% ready," though critical issues like territorial concessions remain unresolved. With incoming U.S. administration transitions and battlefield setbacks, Budanov's expertise in intelligence and special operations could strengthen Kyiv's position in talks.
Reactions in Ukraine vary. Supporters praise the injection of military pragmatism into governance, while critics question whether a serving intelligence officer can effectively manage bureaucratic and political intricacies. Opposition figures have interpreted it as either consolidating power or preparing for post-war transitions. Internationally, the changes are seen as aligning Ukraine more closely with security priorities amid evolving Western support.
This leadership refresh represents one of Zelenskyy's most consequential restructurings since the full-scale invasion began in 2022. As Ukraine navigates military challenges, corruption cleanup, and peace prospects, Budanov's role will be pivotal in shaping strategy from the president's inner circle. Formal procedures for his confirmation were initiated immediately, with expectations of swift implementation.
The developments highlight the intersection of war, politics, and institutional reform in Ukraine, as the nation seeks to fortify its defenses and diplomatic leverage heading into a potentially decisive year.
The reshuffle also reflects broader efforts to professionalize and modernize key institutions under wartime conditions. By elevating figures with proven operational track records, Zelenskyy aims to project resolve both domestically and to international partners. As the conflict enters its fifth year, these changes could influence everything from frontline tactics to high-level negotiations.
Public sentiment has largely welcomed Budanov's elevation, given his reputation for decisiveness and patriotism. His direct involvement in planning complex operations has earned him admiration among troops and civilians alike. However, the transition period may involve adjustments as he shifts from clandestine intelligence work to overt political administration.
Overall, this shake-up reinforces Ukraine's adaptation to prolonged conflict, prioritizing security expertise at the highest levels of government while addressing internal governance concerns following Yermak's exit.
